The Protection Racket
If you're a fan of old gangster movies, that phrase should evoke clear images of mobsters making their weekly rounds of stores in their "territory", extorting cash payments in return for not being beat up, blown up, or burned out.
To be fair, the "protectors" did actually provide some protection... not just from themselves, but from other thieves. The "protectors" were a sort of local police force. They wanted a monopoly on crime in their territory, and the mobsters wanted to protect their sources of protection money. Freelance crooks were not allowed... they either worked for the resident gangster group or they were "eliminated.
Many mobsters were often beneficient with their illicit gains... providing such things as soup kitchens, clubs for kids, and contributing to churches... actually endearing themselves to residents of their turf. If you disregard the source of his money, Al Capone's claim to being philanthropic was valid.
Mobsters also organized and controlled many services the community evidently wanted, such as prostitution, gambling, and illicit substances. They didn't force people to partake, they just profited from providing the services. They provided services people wanted, but that government wouldn't legally allow the people to have.
But... the mobsters were crude and in-your-face. They didn't spend a lot of time trying to convince people that protection was for their own good. They had terrible PR. They struted around publicly in expensive clothes and automobiles. They dealt with problems in person, without discussion, and with finality.
Are we better off we are now, with the mobsters more or less gone?
We don't get personal collection visits from thugs... many of our payments are now hidden in everything we buy. The rest of our payments are just taken out of our paychecks.
We don't have to suck up to some godfather with complaints... we can spend lots more money in court with very little chance of winning.
We don't get beat up for not paying (usually)... we just get all our property taken and go to prison.
With the mob, we only had to deal with the local group. Now we pay protection money to many different organizations... city, county, state, and federal, plus all sorts of other taxing commissions.
We get to hear great speeches and writings about how much good our protection money is doing. That's PR the way the mobsters never even imagined! Our current protectors take responsibility for everything they can spin as a positive, and blame everything bad on someone else, and they're professional at it. At least the mob didn't spend much time trying to convince their victims that they should be happy about it.
Best of all, we get to choose our current crop of protectors every few years. They promise us even more protection from even more dangers, or promise that they'll take less protection money (odd how THAT part never seems to work out). Because we can choose our protectors (even though there aren't many choices and they all seem alike), we can now manage to delude ourselves into believing that we're no longer victims of extortion.
Libertarians view taxes as simple FORCE... as extortion quite literally at the point of a gun. That's not exaggerated... if you fail to pay taxes, you WILL eventually see a gun at your door, and you'll see a lot more later. Taxes are not a choice, not voluntary, not payment for services rendered...they’re simple theft... taking money by force.
Do you like what your money is being used for? I have yet to meet any person who would willingly support all the actions of our governments.
At the moment, hundreds of thousands of Americans are being forced to support a war they believe is disgustingly immoral... but that's just one example. No matter what your likes and dislikes, no matter what your morality or beliefs, your earnings are supporting many actions you would never voluntarily support.
Are we free? Free of the mob? Free of extortion? Free to do WHAT? Just what choices do we have? Can you choose which government programs you want to support? Can you exclude those you think are destructive, immoral, or offensive?
Long ago, when our government was small and still limited, Thomas Jefferson said...
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”Libertarians couldn't agree more. It's wrong, and each one of us is being violated. Worse... we've been bamboozled into thinking we couldn't survive without our current "mob". Fact is, we didn't need the mob in the Roaring 20's, and we don't need them now.


